Skip to content

Internet Explorer is no longer supported by this website.

For optimal browsing we recommend using Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Publications

The Ohio Supreme Court Resolves Split Between Ohio Appellate Courts Interpreting the Ohio Apology Statute

March 2018 - Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal

Publications

The Ohio Supreme Court Resolves Split Between Ohio Appellate Courts Interpreting the Ohio Apology Statute

March 2018 - Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal

Despite a healthcare provider’s best efforts, a patient may experience an unexpected medical outcome, even death. It is an elemental human characteristic to want to offer some expression of sympathy or benevolence — even to apologize for the unanticipated turn of events. An apology may go a long way to diffuse a difficult situation, facilitate healing, preserve relationships, and even avoid later litigation. Yet a healthcare provider may be wary that any such statements would be used later as evidence of negligence or liability in a malpractice suit. To encourage conversations and transparency between healthcare providers, patients, and their families after unanticipated outcomes, Ohio and more than 30 other states, have adopted what are often referred to as “apology statutes.” Ohio’s apology statute — R.C. 2317.43 — provides that a healthcare provider’s “statements, affirmations, gestures, or conduct expressing apology, sympathy, commiseration, condolence, compassion, or a general sense of benevolence” that relate to an unanticipated outcome during medical care are inadmissible as evidence when made to the patient, her family, or her representative.

Read the article here.